Index

Working with MUMIE as author

• Initial steps:
• Articles:
• Problems:
• Programming with Python
• New Visualizations with JSXGraph
• Old Visualizations:
• Media Documents:

Working with MUMIE as teacher

Using MUMIE via plugin in local LMS

FAQ for examination lecturers

Overview

Go back to the old wiki

We revise and update this wiki. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause you.

# Consecutive errors

The automatic correction of generic TeX problems can take into account consecutive errors. This feature is only
available for questions of type input.number or input.function.

Consider a problem with several questions, all of them of type input.number or type input.function.
Assume the solution of the n-th question depends on the solution of the m-th question for some question numbers $$m$$,$$n$$
with $$m < n$$. Say the student's solution of the m-th question was wrong. Then the student used a wrong input for the
n-th question. Assume that, apart from starting with a wrong input, the student solved the n-th question correctly.

This is what we call a consecutive error.

Taking into account consecutive errors means the student doesn't get the points for the m-th question, but the solution
of the n-th question is counted as correct and the points are awarded.

Taking into account consecutive errors works as follows. The questions are corrected one after the other.

For each question, the following happens:

1. First, the question is corrected normally, meaning the student's solution is compared to the correct solution.
2. If the student's solution coincide with the correct solution, everything is ok and the correction proceeds to the
next question.
3. Otherwise, the correction of this question is repeated with certain variables bound to student answers of previous
questions. This is called conditional correction. Which variable is bound to which answer is controlled by the author
using the \earlierAnswer command described below.
4. The score resulting from the conditional correction is compared to that of the normal correction. The correction
with the higher score counts.

The \earlierAnswer command has the following form:

\earlierAnswer{VARIABLE}{QUESTION_NUMBER,ANSWER_NUMBER}

where VARIABLE is the name of the variable defined on global (not question) level, QUESTION_NUMBER
the number of the question and ANSWER_NUMBER the number of the answer.

You can also use -1 for the QUESTION_NUMBER to refer to the same question (see below)

The \earlierAnswer command is only allowed in the "variables" environment of a question.

Do not use the command \earlierAnswer to refer to an earlier question in a problem that has \randomquestionpool enabled! This can cause unwanted behaviour. Problems with random question pools should only use \earlierAnswer for subtasks within the same question, by using the value -1 for the question number.
\earlierAnswer doesn't work in combination with \permuteAnswers.

Below is a complete example of a problem. The problem is trivial: a random number Q is given, and the student has to
compute $$x = Q + 1$$ in the first question, $$y = x + 1$$ in the second, and $$z = y + 1$$ in the third. The second
and third question depend on the solutions of previous questions. To take this into account, we added \earlierAnswer
commands to bind variables to earlier answers. In the second question, for example, we bound x to the first answer of
question 1.

1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162\begin{problem}         \begin{variables}                \randint{Q}{-4}{4}                \function{x}{Q+1}                        \function{y}{x+1}                        \function{z}{y+1}                \end{variables}         \begin{question}                \text{\textbf{Step 1}\\ \textit{Let Q = $\var{Q}$. Compute x = Q + 1:}}                \explanation{Simply add one}                \type{input.number}                \precision{3}                \field{real}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{ x = }                        \solution{x}                \end{answer}        \end{question}         \begin{question}                 \begin{variables}                        \earlierAnswer{x}{1,1}                \end{variables}                 \text{\textbf{Step 2}\\ \textit{Compute y = x + 1:}}                \explanation{Simply add one}                \type{input.number}                \precision{3}                \field{real}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{ y = }                        \solution{y}                \end{answer}         \end{question}         \begin{question}                 \begin{variables}                        \earlierAnswer{x}{1,1}                        \earlierAnswer{y}{2,1}                \end{variables}                 \text{\textbf{Step 3}\\ \textit{Compute z = y + 1:}}                \explanation{Simply add one}                \type{input.number}                \precision{3}                \field{real}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{ z = }                        \solution{z}                \end{answer}         \end{question} \end{problem} 

Here you find a more advanced example in WebMiau with consecutive errors with text answers:
Example 1
Example 2

## Consecutive errors within one question

You can also set the QUESTION_NUMBER to -1 to refer to a previous answer in the same question:

\earlierAnswer{VARIABLE}{-1,ANSWER_NUMBER}

When you use \randomquestionpool (see Randomquestionpool) at the begin of
a problem to make a selection, this is the only case of \earlierAnswer that you can use.

Warning:
If you use \earlierAnswer{VARIABLE}{-1,ANSWER_NUMBER}, be aware of the correction procedure described above.

Wrong use:

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627\begin{problem}         \begin{variables}                \randint{Q}{-4}{4}                \function{x}{Q+1}                        \function{y}{x+1}                \end{variables}         \begin{question}                \begin{variables}                        \earlierAnswer{x}{-1,1}                \end{variables}                 \text{Let Q = $\var{Q}$.}                \type{input.number}                 \begin{answer}        % this answer will always be marked as correct!!                        \text{Compute x = Q + 1:}                        \solution{x}                \end{answer}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{Compute y = x + 1:}                        \solution{y}                \end{answer}                        \end{question}\end{problem} 

In this line of code, the student will always get full score for the first answer. Indeed, if
the answer is wrong, the correction will be repeated with x being the student's first answer,
and so evaluate the first answer as conditionally correct.

The correct way is given by using a copy of the variable x:

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728\begin{problem}         \begin{variables}                \randint{Q}{-4}{4}                \function{x}{Q+1}                \function{xc}{x}                        \function{y}{xc+1}                \end{variables}         \begin{question}                \begin{variables}                        \earlierAnswer{xc}{-1,1}                \end{variables}                 \text{Let Q = $\var{Q}$.}                \type{input.number}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{Compute x = Q + 1:}                        \solution{x}                \end{answer}                 \begin{answer}                        \text{Compute y = x + 1:}                        \solution{y}                \end{answer}                        \end{question}\end{problem} 

Now the solution x of the first answer is not affected by the \earlierAnswer-command,
but the solution y of the second answer will.

# Weighting the score of answers

By default the user obtains the same amount of points for every correct answer within a problem.
An exception is the case where an answer is not evaluated directly (compare the example for CheckFunctionForZero ).

This default can be changed by using the \score-command.

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233\usepackage{mumie.genericproblem} \title{Different Score Weights Per Answer} \begin{problem}   \begin{variables}    \number{a}{1}    \number{b}{2}   \end{variables} \begin{question}      \text{1 or 2?}    \explanation{}     \type{input.number}    \field{real}     \begin{answer}        \text{$1\cdot 1=$}        \solution{a}    \end{answer}     \begin{answer}        \text{$1\cdot 2=$}        \solution{b}        \score{2} % default score is 1    \end{answer} \end{question} \end{problem} 

In the example above, the second answer is given the score weight 2.
Hence, if the total amount of points for the problem is 6, a correct first answer gives 2 points, a correct second answer 4 points.

This also works with answers in multiple questions.

Remark: The total amount of points for a problem is set in the "Settings" of a course in which it is used, and can change from course to course.